Duress applied to a party to a contract makes the agreement:

When duress is applied to a party to a contract, the agreement is considered voidable. This means that the party who was subjected to duress has the legal right to affirm or rescind the contract. Duress typically involves threats, coercion, or undue influence that impacts a person's ability to make a free and informed decision.

In a situation where a contract is formed under duress, the law recognizes that the affected party did not genuinely give their consent, which is a fundamental requirement for a valid contract. Therefore, while the contract remains operative and enforceable until the affected party chooses to void it, they have the option to terminate it due to the circumstances that led to their agreement.

Other options do not apply in this scenario. For instance, a unilateral contract involves only one party making a promise, which is not the situation here. A void contract is one that is treated as null from the beginning and cannot be enforced, typically due to illegality or lack of capacity, which is distinct from contracts made under duress. An illegal contract is one that involves activities prohibited by law, which does not directly relate to the concept of duress affecting the validity of consent. Thus, understanding the nature of duress allows one to correctly identify